Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND A recent meta-analysis raised concern regarding an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes associated with rosiglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes. METHODS We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control while receiving metformin or sulfonylurea, in which 2220 patients were assigned to receive add-on rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone group), and 2227 to receive a combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea (control group). The primary end point was hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS Because the mean follow-up was only 3.75 years, our interim analysis had limited statistical power to detect treatment differences. A total of 217 patients in the rosiglitazone group and 202 patients in the control group had the adjudicated primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.31). After the inclusion of end points pending adjudication, the hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.32). There were no statistically significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group regarding myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes or any cause. There were more patients with heart failure in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.57). CONCLUSIONS Our interim findings from this ongoing study were inconclusive regarding the effect of rosiglitazone on the overall risk of hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. There was no evidence of any increase in death from either cardiovascular causes or all causes. Rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. The data were insufficient to determine whether the drug was associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379769 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
منابع مشابه
Rosiglitazone--continued uncertainty about safety.
On May 21, 2007, the Journal published a metaanalysis by Nissen and Wolski1 that indicated an increased cardiovascular risk associated with rosiglitazone (Avandia), a thiazolidinedione used to treat type 2 diabetes. We published this analysis because it indicated an increase of about 40% in the risk of myocardial infarction among patients receiving rosiglitazone as compared with those receiving...
متن کاملRosiglitazone: An Update
Background The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently considering the fate of rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD) first linked to an increase in cardiovascular events in 2007. The May/June 2007 edition of the RxPress (http://pmpr.pharm.uic.edu/dig/rx/2007%20 v8n3%20MayJun.pdf) summarizes the initial paper, a meta-analysis by Nissen and colleagues, as well as preliminary data (an u...
متن کاملRosiglitazone and cardiotoxicity--weighing the evidence.
The recently published meta-analysis by Nissen and Wolski,1 which suggested a significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction associated with treatment with rosiglitazone (Avandia) and an increase of similar magnitude, albeit nonsignificant, in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes, has created a furor in the press and a quandary for physicians and their patients. Given the vag...
متن کاملThe record on rosiglitazone and the risk of myocardial infarction.
In this issue of the Journal,1 Home and colleagues report interim results from the Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes, or RECORD, study (NCT00379769). The RECORD study is a 6-year, open-label, noninferiority trial in which patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glucose control with metformin or sulfonylurea alone were randomly assigned...
متن کاملSeeking alternatives to Hard End Points: is imaging the best APPROACH?
Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of death resulting from cardiovascular disease, but the best strategy to control excess cardiovascular risk is not yet clear. Although the use of statins and angiotensin antagonists has been successful, treatment of diabetes mellitus itself, especially from the standpoint of degree of glycemic control and type of antidiabetic agents, remains...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The New England journal of medicine
دوره 357 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007